|
|
Forwarded by
Jack, from Atlanta. No mention of this whatever in
the mainstream media, but a former Naval
officer’s blog site has a number of links
and cites that afford more information:
Excerpt: ‘Judge
Malihi talked to the attorneys
in chambers before the hearing
this morning and told them that
he was going to enter a DEFAULT
JUDGMENT against Obama and
recommend that Obama’s name not
be on the Georgia ballot! All
the attorneys expressed a desire
to put an abbreviated
streamlined case on the record
and the judge agreed. How does
the mainstream media spin this?
The Georgia Secretary of State
has already indicated that he
will follow the judge’s
recommendation.’
by Craig
Andresen on January 26, 2012
|
Given
the testimony from today’s court case in
Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do.
His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of
course, was Obama.
The
following is a nutshell account of the
proceedings.
Promptly
at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama
Georgia eligibility case were called to the
Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very
interesting beginning to this long awaited and
important case.
The
case revolved around the Natural Born clause of
the Constitution and whether or not Obama
qualifies under it to serve. More to the point,
if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not
appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.
With
the small courtroom crowded, several in
attendance could be seen fanning themselves with
pamphlets as they waited for the return of the
attorneys and the appearance of the judge.
Obama
himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of
course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama
was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas
and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.
Over
the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney,
Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics
to keep this case from moving forward. He first
tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it
was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski
argued that a state could not, under the law,
determine who would or would not be on a ballot
and later, that Obama was simply too busy with
the duties of office to appear.
After
all these arguments were dispatched by the
Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote
to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to
place Obama above the law and declared that the
case was not to he heard and neither he nor his
client would participate.
Secretary
of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours
later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon
the case and not participate but that he would
do so at his and his clients peril.
Game
on.
5
minutes.
10
minutes.
15
minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s
chambers.
20
minutes.
It appears Jablonski
is not in attendance as the attorneys return,
all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after
meeting in the judge’s chambers.
Has
Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat
not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the
court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the
law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to
appear in court, would we or our attorney be
allowed such action or, non action?
Certainly
not.
Court
is called to order.
Obama’s
birth certificate is entered into evidence.
Obama’s
father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is
entered into evidence.
Pages
214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My
Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This
is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967
that his father’s history is mentioned. It
states that his father’s passport had been
revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
Immigration
Services documents entered into evidence
regarding Obama Sr.
June
27th, 1962, is the date on those
documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a
non citizen of the United States. Documents were
gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony
regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen
is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from
a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The
attorney points out the difference between
“citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using
charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett
opinion.
It
is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment
does not alter the definition or supersede the
meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that
lower court rulings do not conflict with the
Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the
Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.
The
point is, to be a natural born citizen, one
must have 2 parents who, at the time of the
birth in question, be citizens of the United
States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen,
the argument is that Obama,
constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as
President.
Judge
notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present,
action will be taken accordingly.
Carl
Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony
is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear
this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of
Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge
to it by Swinson.
2nd witness,
a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents
testimony regarding documents of challenge to
Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his
candidacy.
Court
records of Obama’s mother and father entered
into evidence.
Official
certificate of nomination of Obama entered into
evidence.
RNC
certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNC
language does NOT include language stating Obama
is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This
shows a direct difference trying to establish
that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama
was not qualified.
Jablonski
letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence
showing their desire that these proceedings not
take place and that they would not participate.
Dreams
From My Father entered.
Mr.
Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Disc
received from Immigration and Naturalization
Service entered into evidence. This disc
contains information regarding the status of
Obama’s father received through the Freedom of
Information Act.
This information
states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a
U.S. Citizen.
At
this point, the judge takes a recess.
The
judge returns.
David
Farrar takes the stand.
Evidence
showing Obama’s book of records listing his
nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant
by the judge.
Orly
Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr.
Strunk.
Enters
into evidence a portion of letter received from
attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s
mother for her passport listing Obama’s last
name something other than Obama.
State
Licensed PI takes the stand.
She
was hired to look into Obama’s background and
found a Social Security number for him from
1977. Professional opinion given that this
number was fraudulent. The number used or
attached to Obama in 1977, shows that the true
owner of the number was born in the 1890. This
shows that the number was originally assigned to
someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and
should never have been used by Obama.
Same
SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and
MA.
Next
witness takes the stand.
This
witness is an expert in information technology
and photo shop. He testifies that the birth
certificate Obama provided to the public is
layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies,
indicates that different parts of the
certificate have been lifted from more than one
original document.
Linda
Jordan takes the stand.
Document
entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama.
SS number is not verified under E Verify. It
comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the
system by which the Government verifies ones
citizenship.
Next
witness.
Mr.
Vogt.
Expert
in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr.
Vogt testifies that the birth certificate,
posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States
white lines around all the type face is caused
by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that
any document showing this, is considered to be a
fraud.
States
this is a product of layering.
Mr.
Vogt testifies that a straight scan of an
original document would not show such layering.
Also
testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama
documents should not be in exact same place on
various documents as they are hand stamped.
Obama’s documents are all even, straight and
exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand
stamped by layered into the document by
computer.
Next
witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and
former immigration officer specializing in
immigration fraud.
Ran
Obama’s SS number through database and found
that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in
the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided
in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was
living in Hawaii.
Serial
number on birth certificate is out of sequence
with others issued at that hospital. Also
certification is different than others and
different than twins born 24 hours ahead of
Obama.
Mr.
Sampson also states that portion of documents
regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have
been redacted which is highly unusual with
regards to immigration records.
Suggests
all records from Social Security, Immigration,
Hawaii birth records be made available to see if
there are criminal charges to be filed or not.
Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
Mr. Sampson
indicates if Obama is shown not to be a
citizen, he should be arrested and deported
and until all records are released nobody can
know for sure if he is or is not a U.S.
Citizen.
Taitz
shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama,
showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at
the same time.
Taitz
takes the stand herself.
Testifies
that records indicate Obama records have been
altered and he is hiding his identity and
citizenship.
Taitz
leave the stand to make her closing arguments.
Taitz
states that Obama should be found, because of
the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as
President.
And
with that, the judge closes the hearing.
What
can we take away from this?
It’s
interesting.
Now,
all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY
into court records.
One
huge question is now more than ever before,
unanswered.
WHO
THE HELL IS THIS GUY?
Without
his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his
Social Security number, his citizenship status,
and his past are all now OFFICIALLY in question.
One
thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT
qualify, under the definition of Natural Born
Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be
eligible to serve as President.
What
will the judge decide? That is yet to be known,
but it seems nearly impossible to believe,
without counter testimony or evidence, because
Obama and his attorney chose not to participate,
that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia
ballot.
It
also opens the door for such cases pending or to
be brought in other states as well.
Obama
is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of
explaining to do unless they start looking for a
new candidate for 2012.