Which "Sword" will "Jael" use?

As many of you know, today, Dec. 5th, the Supreme Court conferenced to discuss whether to formally hear the Donofrio case concerning Obama's eligibility for the highest office in the land, U.S. President. On the previous post, I showed how it is the sword of the law that will inflict the deadly head wound to the usurper, and true to form or "type", his 'false prophet' is continuing to cover the matter in an obviously biased fashion-- preferring to call all those who wish to uphold the Constitution as tin-foil hat wearing nut cases. We should expect no less from this "false prophet," should we?

Here are some relevant excerpts from an excellent blog on the Obama BC issue (note well, that the term "usurper" is now commonly being used to describe Obama...perfectly fitting the pattern of the biblical types as already discussed in prior posts this week):

"On assessing the danger of a usurper and the question of a standing army, Alexander Hamilton, in The Federalist Papers, reasoned that 'the supposed utility of a provision of this type [regarding a standing army in peace time] must be founded upon a supposed probability, or at least a possibility, of a combination of the executive and legislative in some scheme of usurpation.' While this statement was in relation to the raising of a standing army in peace-time, it was a clear recognition that there would always be an internal threat to our country from schemes of usurpation. The strong federalist viewpoint favored the protection of its Citizens from all acts detrimental to the Constitution, and empowered this to the U.S. Supreme Court.

What is shockingly disturbing to me is the sheer number of people potentially involved in this deception: the parties, the House and Senate members, the Commissions, the state Secretaries of State, and the candidate himself. Equally as disturbing is the simple question: why is there no intention to provide this most basic information? It is a combination, in my view, of laziness of public officials, ignorance of the law-perhaps as a result of education- a stressed out and demoralized public, the â€œmassesâ€ vulnerable to the hopium, and very possibly of that a scheme of usurpation and avoidance of the Constitution has been underway for some time.

Article V permits the Congress to propose amendments to the Constitution, and requires ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures. Thus if we, as a nation of immigrants, want to amend the Constitution to allow people like Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of POTUS pursuant to some other tests regarding his character, residency requirements, et cetera, we can do this. But not by January 20th, and not by the popular vote.

The Supreme Courtâ€™s role is to provide this guidance to us when no one else will do so, and when the candidate himself is attempting to usurp the powers of the United States by evading Constitutional scrutiny. In classic Alinsky style, we have a person who has been â€˜electedâ€™ by the popular vote unwilling to prove himself eligible to serve as POTUS, and who is callously willing to risk (and use) civil unrest to avoid having to prove himself eligible."

This afternoon the Lord prompted me to look at ALL of the possible "swords or tent peg/nails our little friend, Jael behind the walled fortress" might use to inflict this deadly blow to the usurper's head. Who might that be? Will it be the Donofrio case currently being considered? Or will it be another?

To answer this question and discover the likelihood of which case it might be, we first have to consider all the cases presently pending, even in state court since the possibility exists that the petitioner may take it to the U.S. Supreme Court for consideration at a later point.

Listed below are the meanings of the petitioner names of cases currently pending. There are, in my opinion, two or possibly three that fit the "prophetic" bill as the likely "nail" that Jael will use to strike the head of "Sisera".

Donofrio - Southern Italian: patronymic from the personal name Onofrio, an adaptation of Egyptian Onnophris (said to mean always happy), an epithet of the god Osiris. The name gained popularity in Italy through the cult of St. Onofrio, a 5th-century martyr.

*Berg - Jewish (Ashkenazic): ornamental name from German Berg mountain, hill, or a short form of any of the many ornamental surnames containing this word as the final element, for example SchÃ¶nberg.

Strunk - North German: from Middle Low German strunk stalk, stump, hence a nickname for a short, stout, ungainly person, or a topographic name for someone who lived in an area with tree trunks.

*Lightfoot - English (chiefly northern England, especially Liverpool): nickname for a messenger or for a fast runner, from Middle English lyght light, nimble, quick (Old English lioht) + fote foot.

Terry - English and Irish: from the common Norman personal name, T(h)erry (Old French Thierri), composed of the unattested Germanic element Ã¾eudo- people, race + ric power. Southern French: occupational name for a potter, from Occitan terrin earthenware vase (a diminutive of terre earth, Latin terra).

Martin - A derivative of Mars, genitive Martis, the Roman god of fertility and war, whose name may derive ultimately from a root mar gleam). A habitational name in Old English as settlement by a lake (from mere or mÃ¦r pool, lake + tun settlement) or as settlement by a boundary.

Sullivan - Irish: reduced form of OSullivan, an Anglicized form of Gaelic Ã“ SÃºileabhÃ¡in descendant of SÃºileabhÃ¡n, a personal name composed of the elements sÃºil eye + dubh black, dark + the diminutive suffix -Ã¡n.

Of all of these cases, only a few have a prophetic implication of being the candidate for the "sword" or "tent peg/nail" to strike the apparently fatal blow-- Keyes, Lightfoot, Berg and possibly either Martin or Terry.

Keyes, in my opinion, is the best case-- but time will tell which one will be the prophetic and legal fit. In any event, while the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to make an announcement on Monday concerning the Donofrio case, I am not expecting this case to be "the sword" she will use. If anything, a "denied" ruling may harden support in the usurper's corner even more, and make the casting away even moreso apparent once Sisera's head is finally struck. They will not care for the rule of law, nor that they have been deceived, even as the Scriptures prophesy.

Do not be weary, nor give up to quickly, if you see Donofrio's case denied on Monday (see his Citizen Wells blog for updates). I fully expect the prophetic types will be played out, but God is the author of this story, and so we must wait upon Him to reveal these secrets at the right time.