This is in reply to Lauren here: http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/dec2008/lauren1212.htmYou asked, "Could the scheduled dinner or feast that Obama attends be the gala inaugural luncheon after his swearing in on Jan 20, 2009?"It depends (I'll give my understanding to that shortly).I believe if these things are types playing out before us, then none of the Supreme Court cases currently brought by petitioners are going to prevail. The type shows that Sisera (BHO) is to be on the run (losing in a state Sup. Ct. case) and that HE seeks out refuge in the tents of Heber ("friend"/US Sup. Ct.) whom we know to be Justice Ginsberg...a jewish woman who perfectly typifies "Jael." As of this writing, we are still waiting to hear news about Keyes' case that is reported as having had a "tentative" court date of 12/11/08.So what we know is that there must be a state court case ruling come first, in which Obama loses. Maybe this will take place before the Electors meet on Monday (Keyes case)-- maybe not. But it is my opinion that even if it comes before the electors meet, the electors will still vote for BHO anyway, under the assumption that the U.S. Supreme Court would "rectify their obvious mistake" of the state court's ruling. Some electors have already said that because the issue has not been addressed by the Supreme Court, that they are free to interpret the meaning any way they want. Either way, the masses will get their "Barrabas"-- by both popular vote and elector vote.Whether it occurs before or after the electors meet, it will cause an uproar. But it will be particularly bad if the ruling comes out after the electors meet, since the people will view this as an attempt to circumvent their "vote". It matters not, mind you, that he is a liar and deceiver, nor that he is not qualified and purposely tried to hide it-- they care not for the rule of law...they are, as the Scriptures say, lawless in their heart, and totally given over to a Spirit of deception.What we have here is a literal war manifesting on earth as it is even now ongoing in heaven. The recent news concerning the rather obvious connections between BHO and the Illinois Governor testify that God is in the process of making PUBLIC that which has been done in secret. These are happening, I believe, due to the warfare of prayer by the saints as more and more are aware of how serious the time is right now. Watch for a ruling on the former Governor of Alabama's appeal as well-- these are all signs. The Illinois governor's name means "a boring gentile". The former Alabama governor's name means "maker of SEALS and SIGNET RINGS." Watch.Many of the things I have shared thus far can be confirmed in understanding the following Scripture:"And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heel." (Gen. 3:15).
Jesus' HEAD was 'bruised' (under the foot of the adversary) when his HEADSHIP / RULERSHIP right to the throne was stripped BY THE "COURT". Recall that it was the Sanhedrin court that ruled against him, and this ruling was ultimatley supported by the roman government & voted for by the people. Yet Jesus 'bruised' satan's HEEL when He rose from the dead (in victory). Thus, it could be said that Jesus had, as it were, a "deadly head wound that was healed."
Antichrist will go thru the exact same thing-- but it's now HIS turn.
HIS HEAD will be 'bruised' under OUR feet (prayer warfare) and the result will be that his HEADSHIP / RULERSHIP right to the throne will be stripped by THE U.S. SUPREME COURT (just as the Sanhedrin stripped it from Jesus). Yet, even though he will receive a "deadly head wound" (as the saint's prayer war in the heavenlies is "trodding him underfoot), he will "bruise" OUR heel. His "death" is the U.S. Supreme Court delivering a judicial blow to his 'head'/rulership--- and his coming back to "life", as it were, is when they make an end-run around the Constitution and give him the "headship" anyway. How they do this, we shall see- but be aware that the Ohio legislature introduced a bill on Dec. 3rd on the issue of calling a Constitutional Convention (see: http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/JournalText127/HJ-12-03-08.pdf ; http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/12/constitution-and-libertarian-parties-of-ohio-among-those-working-to-defeat-a-bill-calling-for-us-constitutional-convention/). Be ware that if this opening of pandora's box occurs, it effectively puts our country under an entirely new government.Scripture tells us there is "nothing new under the sun" and so history may also give us a clue as to how this 'end-run' around the law of the land will take place. Here again is an excerpt regarding how Hitler overcame the little problem of the "law" being against him:Hitler's cabinet passed a law proclaiming the presidency dormant and transferred the role and powers of the head of state to Hitler as FÃhrer und Reichskanzler (leader and chancellor). Thereby Hitler also became supreme commander of the military, whose officers then swore an oath not to the state or the constitution but to Hitler personally. In a mid-August plebiscite, these acts found the approval of 84.6% of the electorate (Give us Barabbas!!) This action technically violated both the constitution and the Enabling Act. The constitution had been amended in 1932 to make the president of the High Court of Justice, not the chancellor, acting president until new elections could be held. The Enabling Act specifically barred Hitler from taking any action that tampered with the presidency. However, no one dared object. With this action, Hitler effectively removed the last remedy by which he could be dismissed from office� and with it, all checks and balances on his power.
In some way then, we know that he WILL be the leader of this country, but he will not be the legal or lawful leader because the types show that he will sidestep the Constitution (and the Supreme Court's ultimate ruling against him). It must be this way as this end-run around the constitution is "when the deadly HEAD wound is healed" and when our "HEEL is bruised."
they did NOT accept Jesus who came in the name of the Father, yet "he who comes in his own name, HIM they WILL accept". When that happens and he is given the headship/rulership (when his head wound is healed), that is also when our "heel is bruised." Just as satan's heel was bruised when Jesus was brought back to 'life', so too will our heel be bruised when his bid for headship/rulership is brought back to 'life.' I don't think I have to elaborate on what that means for all of us in the "foot company." These are perilous times.This brings me to your question, Lauren. I had considered that 'perhaps' the inaugural 'feast' may be the type of Haman's feast/revealing and Judas' revealing at the last supper- thereby giving us an idea of timing. However, it seems implausible to me for several reasons.1) This would mean that the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the very day of the inauguration (very unlikely that they would do that).2) There is plenty of time between now and then for a case to make it to that level well BEFORE Jan. 20th (which I believe they would do, rather than put the country in jeopardy by allowing a usurper to be sworn in).3) Spiritually, we know that his "revealing" occurs because the usurper is "betrayed" by one he considers a "friend" (replaying the scene as Judas did to Jesus), and we have already made the connection that this friend is Ginsberg and the U.S. Supreme Court. Remember that Judas was revealed as the betrayer to at least some of the disciples first, when he dipped his bread in the sop at the same time as Jesus. This tells me that either Ginsberg and BHO have to be at the same literal feast and then the Supreme Court rules against him the next day--- or else the understanding is not to be literally understood, but rather spiritually discerned. I opt for the latter.It is my opinion that the type of the banquet or "Last Supper" is when the Court "chews and digests the WORDs in his brief (a type of "eating his body/blood") when they are weighing the case in the Supreme Court conference room at the long table. His WORDS (showing us an "anti" to the true WORD, Christ) are to be "with them" at the table as they chew and digest upon them in making a decision. It is at that table that he will be "betrayed" (as he sees it) by a "friend"-- Justice Ginsberg -- who will rule rightly according to law, not the whims of politicians or the rule of majority. She is the "little" woman who will strike the deadly blow to his "HEADship". As it is written, "Do not despise the day of small (little) things."The other types support this as well. Haman and Esther-- Esther invited Haman to banquet. Haman "thought" Esther was his "friend". In Haman's eyes, Esther "betrayed" him when she revealed his murderous plan to the king. Even Sisera and Jael-- Jael allowed him to take refuge in her tent-- and then gave him provisions/milk to drink. Sisera "thought" Jael was his "friend" (Heber/Hebron/friend). In Sisera's eyes, Jael "betrayed" him..Thus, the "feast" must coincide with a "friend" who "betrays" him (as he sees it) at the feast. I don't see how this can occur if we take it to mean a literal feast or supper, especially given that not everyone would know or be aware of who all is at the event, nor what they said or did there, and it is unlikely that the justices would be there at all.But by looking at it in this way, in a spiritually discernible manner, it is very plain and apparent to all-- if we see it through eyes of the Spirit. The jews missed the obvious signs in front of them, so I would expect no less this time.However-- I DO believe that since he will take the kingdom by flattery (not legally) by making and end-run around the Constitution, that there will be a "writing on the wall" type take place during the inauguration "feast". This comes AFTER the 'betrayal', the deadly head wound, and the healing of the deadly head wound by circumventing the law and installing him as President. The King of Babylon was congratulating himself, and bringing out the holy vessels of God to drink out of..blatantly mocking God and his people by doing so. A spiritual fulfillment of this would be BHO mocking God's holy vessels-- Christians -- during this feast. He will be congratulating himself on what he has accomplished, taking the 'kingdom', and overcoming all the right wing Christians who opposed him. Can you hear him say it? I can. This would be, as it were, mocking the holy vessels of God. And I am quite sure---God will respond.This whole thing, by the way, is allowed purposely to occur because it gives God legal cause against him and to bring judgment upon Babylon (and deliver us from the depths of bondage we are in to its system). This is the beginning of judgment, and it is marked by his inauguration-- Yes, something is going to occur "shortly after he takes office"-- but the reason is BECAUSE he takes office.Another topic the Lord had me look more into, thanks to Michele's question earlier concerning Comet McNaught.
As stated, McNaught means both "son of wickedness/perdition" and also "Son of the Pledge". There are always two-sided parallels that I see the Lord using, so consider this just another one.
A "Pledge" is a downpayment. We know this in Scripture then to be the "pledge" of the Holy Spirit that we receive-- and when Christ is "birthed" in us, we are by definition "Sons of the 'Pledge'". What can we know about BHO as it pertains to this sign then?
The sign of Comet McNaught occurring on the date that Obama made an informal announcement tells us the same thing occurred to him -- he is the "son of the UNHOLY 'pledge'" --a strong counterfeit spirit of delusion and empowerment came upon him on that date, and that is why the whole world has gone absolutely MAD over him.
Blessings and Glory to Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior,Anonymous Lurker
*************************************************For background reference, see chronologically: