The problem with the suggestion that the identity of the "friend" that may
"betray" the usurper is Justice Barlay Surrick is this---
1) He is not a U.S. Supreme Court Justice (he is a federal district court
judge). Therefore he is not among those slated at the "last supper" (court of
last resort), as it were.
2) He is the district judge in Pennsylvania and ruled WITH and FOR
Obama (not against him) by denying standing to Berg (thus he actually is his
"friend").
3) He has no connection to the Keyes case since Keyes is in the
California Superior Court (not Pennsylvania).
4) He is not a woman (thus not fitting the type of "Jael")
5) His name does not mean "friend" (as Justice Ginsberg, a woman,
does).
6) The type shows Sisera "running to" this "friend" (i.e., he loses at the
state Supreme Court level and "appeals" for help at the U.S. Supreme
Court).
Hopefully, that clarifies it a bit more as to why there is only one
person that "fits the bill" for the "betrayer" of this usurper....U.S. Supreme
Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. But bless you, Nando, for your diligent
watch and study. ;-)
Blessings and Glory to Jesus Christ our Lord and
Savior,
Anonymous Lurker
*************************************************
For background reference, see chronologically: