Dear John & Doves,
 
I found the following news item highly disturbing, but not a
surprise, considering that the apostate so-called 'archbishop'
has already blasphemed God with his embrace of the recent fake
'bible' which purports to be a new 'translation' of God's Word.
 
I have no illusions that Dr. Williams will ever read my words
on this Forum, but I felt compelled to comment on his latest
deceptive babbling nevertheless:
 
>Muslims can go to heaven, says Archbishop
>By Jonathan Petre, Religion Correspondent
>(Filed: 30/08/2004)
 
>http://www.telegraph.co.uk
 
>The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, yesterday
>vented his frustrations with the Church factions warring over
>homosexuality and also reminded Christians that they did not
>have a monopoly on the afterlife.
 
It is my belief that King Jesus will properly condemn Dr. Williams
as a heretic when Williams one day stands before Him. Williams is
speaking directly against the Holy Spirit by promoting the view
that there are 'many ways to Heaven' when in fact there is only ONE,
i.e., Jesus Christ, the only Holy Son of God. Williams is damning
his own soul, for he is leading others astray with such teachings.
 
>In a rare glimpse of his anger over the row that has overshadowed
>his first two years at Canterbury, Dr Williams said the debate
>had lacked grace and patience.
 
Perhaps Dr. Williams preferred the 'grace and patience' which was
displayed at his honorary induction into the paganistic Druids in
June of 2002, prior to his promotion to his current vaunted title
as the 'Archbishop of Canterbury'? On that occasion, Dr Williams
(given the Bardic name of 'ap Aneurin') said that the ceremony was
"one of the greatest honours that Wales can bestow on her citizens"
and then defended the pagan druids by saying: "The suggestion that
the Gorsedd is even remotely associated with paganism is deeply
offensive."
 
It is Dr. Williams who is deeply offensive to all things Christian.
 
>He said that this had been aggravated by pressure groups with
>entrenched positions who posted instant reactions to events on
>their websites.
 
Dr. Williams does not comprehend that the ultimate 'pressure group'
is the Kingdom of God, and that the 'entrenched positions' of Jesus
Christ, will remain the same, Yesterday, Today and Forever. Unless
Williams repents of his blasphemies and seeks forgiveness, he will
be on the outside looking in for all eternity.
 
>The Archbishop also admitted to failing to live up to people's
>expectations, a reference to the disappointment many felt that he
>had not been more radical over his opposition to the war in Iraq.
 
Dr. Williams, who in this article appears to be positioning himself
as a champion for Muslims, ought to ask himself why he would oppose
the liberation of Iraq, which brought religious freedom of choice to
millions of Iraqi citizens (most of them Muslims) who had previously
been oppressed and unable to worship as they wished under the regime
of Saddam Hussein. If he seeks to advocate on the behalf of Muslims,
he ought to be praising Tony Blair and George W. Bush for liberating
the people of Iraq so they can worship in freedom and without fear.
(I suspect Williams would cut out his own tongue before he would say
one kind word about either Blair OR Bush...)
 
>He surprised some at the three-day Greenbelt festival in Cheltenham,
>Glos, by declaring that Muslims can go to heaven.
 
If Muslims renounce and reject the satanic death cult known as Islam,
and accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour, they indeed can go
to Heaven. (that probably isn't what Williams had in mind...)
 
>Dr Williams said that neither he nor any Christian could control access
>to heaven. "It is possible for God's spirit to cross boundaries," he said.
 
"Possible"? How about "absolutely"? God's Eternal Holy Spirit knows NO
boundaries whatsoever, for God Almighty is omnipotent, ominescient and
omnipresent, unconstrained by any laws of physics, time, space, etc.
 
>"I say this as someone who is quite happy to say that Jesus is the way,
>the truth and the life, and no one comes to the Father except by Jesus.
>But how God leads people through Jesus to heaven, that can be quite
>varied, I think."
 
Williams is entering dangerous territory here. He is attempting to equate
Jesus Christ with other paganistic idols and beliefs, in the old satanic
tactic of promoting ecumenicalism, the idea that (once again) there are
"many ways to Heaven", via "many" beliefs, via "many" religions, and if
that were so, there would be no need for Jesus Christ to have been born,
to have been crucified, to have been resurrected, for out of all of the
'other' ways that Williams is enamored of, there are more than a few
philosophies which teach the attainment of eternal awards (i.e. 'heaven')
by self-improvement, by spiritual contemplation techniques (meditation,
yoga, hypnosis, chants, you name it), all of which discount the need for
a Personal Saviour, that Saviour being Jesus Christ, the Holy Son of God.
 
>During a wide-ranging discussion, Dr Williams reflected his disappointment
>at the tone of the debate on homosexuality, and his dismay at the vitriol
>of many of the e-mails he had received.
 
Alright now: which one of you Five Doves posters have been emailing Williams
and giving him an earful about his departure from the Faith? (just kidding)
 
Seriously, Williams demonstrates that he is more concerned about defending
the sinful practices of Sodom and Gomorrah. There is not any 'debate' on
homosexuality, God condemns it, and that's the end of it. Williams has not
a word to say on the subject, except to either obey God's Word, or continue
with his apostatic blasphemies. I have concluded that he will regretfully
continue to defend and condone that which God has called an "Abomination".
 
>"It is not so much that we have disagreement in the Church - that happens,"
>he said. "It is more to do with how those disagreements are conducted. The
>dismissiveness, the rawness of the anger . . need to be worked with."
 
Jesus Christ chose to drive the moneychangers out of the Temple with a whip,
and His Righteous Anger was fully justified. For all of Jesus' kindnesses,
for His gentle Spirit, for his Love for all humanity, Jesus unleashed His
Wrath when it was appropriate to do so. And one day, I believe Dr. Williams
will experience that Wrath first hand. I would not want to be in his shoes
on that Day.
 
>Speaking about the furore that followed the appointment of the gay cleric
>Dr Jeffrey John as Bishop of Reading, a post from which Dr John later
>withdrew, Dr Williams said that both sides had suffered shock.
 
Dr. Williams is going to be in for the shock of his life when he discovers
that God will not be mocked.
 
>Dr John, who was recently installed as Dean of St Albans, was also a
>speaker at the festival yesterday.
 
>The Archbishop said: "On both sides of the debate as it evolved, quite
>a lot of people had to learn that the Church of England wasn't just them,
>because what I heard a lot of on both sides of the controversy was 'we
>thought the Church of England was us and people like us and maybe one
>or two others who don't matter very much'.
 
Dr. Williams needs to take his pontifications to a more appropriate venue,
like (perhaps) ...Oprah.
 
>"I was intrigued by the mirror imaging that went on there. There was a
>sense on both sides, therefore, of shock and dispossession, that it is
>not all ours after all. It is not full of faithful evangelicals
 
If not, it should be. And if not, why not?
 
>it is not full of enlightened liberals.
 
I think that even the youngest baby Christians can comprehend what
Dr Williams and his ilk are 'full of'.
 
>"Very quickly pressure groups can form and settle and decide where they
>stand and invest in where they stand.
 
Actually, Dr. Williams would have no problem with 'pressure groups' if
they were all in lockstep with his own abominable, apostate opinions.
 
"We haven't had an effective forum in which that process can be slowed,
not just for the sake of putting things off but for the sake of mutual
understanding. We haven't quite found that forum yet. It is not the
General Synod. It is certainly not the trading of websites."
 
This is what happens when a religious 'leader' becomes more focused on
social advocacy, on political correctness, on the goal of giving the
masses 'what they want' instead of what they NEED: which is the Gospel
of Jesus Christ.
 
It is my view that Rowan Williams is either a willing, or unwitting tool
of Satan himself.
 
Regards,
 
John Russell