John Russell
(23
Aug 2004)
"Re: F.E.M.A."
Dear John, Doves & Brother Joe Hoyle
>HELLO
Hello to you too Brother. Hope all is well with you.
>Some months ago, I made a post saying that in event
people
>found themselves victims of any kind of disaster or
catastrophe;
>that they should expect little or no help from the likes
of FEMA;
>and that they had better be prepared to fend for themselves
the
>best that they can do.That is because FEMA is capable
of being
>little more than a traffic cop, which is what I said
at the
>time--and a bureaucratic traffic cop at that.The two
articles
>below are proof positive of that; despite recent empty
Washington
>political rhetoric to the contrary.
While I agree with you Joe that bureaucracy is often
the problem, I
would not go so far as to suggest that (regarding the
victims of
Hurricane Charley) people have to 'fend for themselves'
because
there would be "little or no help from the likes of FEMA".
Your
two articles demonstrate that there have been problems
with the
recovery effort in Florida. But those articles do not
prove that
ALL of FEMA's efforts have been of no help at all. It
takes no
talent at all to find examples of bureaucracy (be it
FEMA or any
other government agency) lacking efficiency, and failing
to meet
the expectations of the taxpayers depending on that agency
to do
their jobs. That does not mean that the entire agency
is without
value, far from it. Only a fool or a blind man would
believe that
there exists a federal agency that is run perfectly,
as it was
intended to do, without waste, without corruption, without
error.
The fact is, because such agencies, from the highest
levels to
the lowest, are equally prone to failure as they are
to success,
not because they are all evil bureaucrats, not because
they are
all participants in some horrifying conspiracy, but because
they
(like you and I) are human. Imperfect, sinning humans.
The kind
that Jesus Christ died on the Cross to Redeem. I submit
to you
that for every bureaucratic foul up, for every grand
example of
government waste (and there are many!), there are also
numerous
examples where government agencies and the workers who
staff them
have performed not only up to standard, but magnificently.
But we
never hear much about the successes, because as we all
know: "bad
news sells best". And that is why disasters of all magnitudes
sell
the most papers, and generate the largest viewerships
and numbers
of listeners from television and radio respectively.
>And I might add; in speaking of human traffic control:
FEMA's
>chief claim to fame one day will be in human relocation--as
in
>providing Christian's, patriots, and others with one
way tickets
>and transportation to the death camps.Outside of that,
FEMA
>really ain't worth spit when the rubber hits the road.
Which 'death camps' are you referring to Brother Joe?
Regards,
John Russell