Freshmen required to undergo homosexual indoctrination {Excerpts]

With last week's stunning revelations that the entire faculty of a
Midwestern university campus voted without dissent to investigate a
Christian librarian for "sexual harassment" simply because he recommended
the bestselling book "The Marketing of Evil," many are asking why not a
single faculty member stood up for the librarian.

The question is especially compelling in light of the decision reported
Wednesday that the entire faculty had essentially overstepped their own
written policies and had wrongly accused the librarian.

The lock-step faculty support for the two openly homosexual professors who
led the charge against the librarian might have something to do with the
fact that freshmen at the small Mansfield campus of Ohio State University
are required, during their first quarter, to undergo what the university
calls a "diversity seminar." But critics say the type of "tolerance
re-education" OSU mandates uses tactics reminiscent of those of Chinese
communist revolutionary leader Mao Tse-Tung.

Scott Savage, a devout Quaker, is head of Reference and Instructional
Services at the Bromfield Library on Ohio State University's Mansfield
campus. As a member of the university's First Year Reading Experience
Committee, Savage had suggested four books be considered as required reading
for incoming freshmen: "The Marketing of Evil" by David Kupelian, "The
Professors" by David Horowitz, "Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis" by Bat Ye'or,
and "It Takes a Family" by Sen. Rick Santorum. Savage made the
recommendations after other committee members had suggested a series of
books with a left-wing perspective, by authors such as Jimmy Carter and
Maria Shriver.

However, three professors ­ two of them openly homosexual ­ filed a
complaint of discrimination and harassment, contending Kupelian's book was
"hate literature" which "threatened" them and made them feel "unsafe" on
campus. After a 21-0 faculty vote (with 9 abstentions) on March 13, the
school's Office of Human Resources put Savage under "investigation." The
full-faculty vote was rescinded two days later for legal reasons, and the
three offended professors filed the harassment complaint.

Stepping up to defend Savage has been the Arizona-based public-interest law
firm, the Alliance Defense Fund.

Despite a "Cease and Desist" letter the Alliance Defense Fund sent to OSU
Mansfield officials in Savage's defense March 28, the investigation went
forward, with the university insisting it takes "any allegation of sexual
harassment seriously."

Finally, since WorldNetDaily, Sean Hannity, MSNBC, Fox News' Brit Hume, the
New York Post, Human Events, and dozens of bloggers brought the case to
national attention, Ohio State University has reversed course and notified
Savage the charges had been dropped.

For many, the most disconcerting part of the case is that no faculty members
dissented from what eventually was ruled to be an unfair allegation brought
by two "gay" professors.

"The fact that there are one or two unhinged professors out there ­ that's
not news," said David French, the lead ADF attorney defending Savage. "But
the fact that by a 21-0 vote, with 9 abstentions, the faculty would classify
a book recommendation as sexual harassment -- that show's there's an illness
that has infected the academy."

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49877