Jim
Bramlett
(15 Apr 2006)
"Re:Jim Bramlett Countdown
to 2006?"
My
reply in red below.
Jim,
I found your post on the
significance of Daniel 9:25 very interesting. I respect your views
and always look forward to reading what you have posted.
I am a little confused
with the "49" and "7" of Daniel 9:25. "He comes to 2006 by adding
the 49 and 7 years of Daniel 9:25 to January 23, 1950, with the gamma-ray
burst in 1999 as triggering the final 7 years." Final as in tribulation
period?
No. The final seven years before
the Tribulation.
You mention at the end
that "By way of remembrance, the brilliant Sir Isaac Newton, the father
of modern science, believed the wording of Daniel 9:25 referred to both
the first and second coming of Jesus."
The second coming at the
end of the tribulation period? Newton apparently
had no understanding of the rapture and what he saw as the second coming
may have been the rapture, which is also a coming, for His saints
just prior to His coming with His saints.
Are you saying that the
gamma burst signaled the beginning of tribulation.
No.
See above. Is that the "7"? If not, what are the 49
years and the 7 years, especially the "7" years? Was this just a
warning of the Rapture?
Danial speaks of seven weeks
(49 years) as well as a 70th week (seven years). No one knows exactly
how they will play out. I am not preaching how it will happen but
merely sharing the view of the fellow in Florida from whom I received an
e-mail. He may or may not be correct but the calculations and events
are interesting.
Anxiously waiting for
His appearing,
Bea